🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.